- Research article
- Open Access
Persistence of virus-specific immune responses in the central nervous system of mice after West Nile virus infection
© Stewart et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 9 June 2010
Accepted: 20 January 2011
Published: 20 January 2011
West Nile virus (WNV) persists in humans and several animal models. We previously demonstrated that WNV persists in the central nervous system (CNS) of mice for up to 6 months post-inoculation. We hypothesized that the CNS immune response is ineffective in clearing the virus.
Immunocompetent, adult mice were inoculated subcutaneously with WNV, and the CNS immune response was examined at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16 weeks post-inoculation (wpi). Characterization of lymphocyte phenotypes in the CNS revealed elevation of CD19+ B cells for 4 wpi, CD138 plasma cells at 12 wpi, and CD4+ and CD8+ T cells for at least 12 wpi. T cells recruited to the brain were activated, and regulatory T cells (Tregs) were present for at least 12 wpi. WNV-specific antibody secreting cells were detected in the brain from 2 to 16 wpi, and virus-specific CD8+ T cells directed against an immunodominant WNV epitope were detected in the brain from 1 to 16 wpi. Furthermore, these WNV-specific immune responses occurred in mice with and without acute clinical disease.
Virus-specific immune cells persist in the CNS of mice after WNV infection for up to 16 wpi.
West Nile virus (WNV), a member of the family Flaviviridae, is a positive-sense, single-stranded RNA virus, which is maintained in a mosquito-bird enzootic cycle. Upon incidental infection with WNV, approximately 20% of humans experience a self-limiting illness called "West Nile fever", and less than 1% develop West Nile neuroinvasive disease (WNND) . WNND is characterized by encephalitis, myelitis, and/or meningitis and can lead to death [2–4]. In addition to acute disease, long term sequelae occur in individuals recovering from West Nile fever and WNND [3, 5–8]. The underlying mechanisms resulting in these sequelae remain unclear, but may partly be due to viral persistence.
Several studies provide evidence for persistence of WNV in humans. WNV RNA persists in urine of convalescent patients for as long as 6.7 years after disease onset . In blood donors, WNV RNA is detected in blood as long as 104 days after index donation . WNV-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) persists in serum of patients with West Nile disease and WNV-positive blood donors for as long as 11 to 16 months [10–13]. In addition, IgM persists in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with WNND for as long as 5 months . The long term persistence of IgM suggests that virus and/or viral antigen persists in the periphery and possibly in the CNS of immunocompetent humans infected with WNV.
The goal of the current study was to further our understanding of WNV persistence, using a mouse model in which WNV RNA persists in the CNS for up to 6 months post-inoculation . We characterized the lymphocyte populations present in the CNS at various times post-inoculation. CD138+ plasma cells and CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were elevated in the CNS of mice for at least 3 months after infection with WNV. In addition, WNV-specific plasma cells and WNV-epitope specific CD8+ T cells were present for up to 16 wpi, suggesting that WNV is able to persist in the CNS despite the presence of virus specific immune cells.
We previously showed that WNV RNA persists in the CNS of C57BL/6 (B6) mice for up to 6 months post-inoculation, and this persistence occurs in the face of active inflammation in the brain and a strong serum antibody response and in mice with subclinical infection . Our goal in this study was to characterize this inflammation in the CNS during viral persistence in our B6 mouse model and to determine if the immune cells were virus-specific. Brains and spinal cords were harvested from mice, and the phenotypes of infiltrating CNS leukocytes were determined at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16 wpi. Since not all B6 mice exhibit West Nile disease , we distributed mice that had been sick during acute infection (7 to 14 days post-inoculation) evenly throughout each time point within an individual study (noted as open symbols in figures) in order not to bias the results. Although the numbers of sick mice were small, we did not observe any consistent correlation between disease and any cellular parameter.
Phenotype of lymphocytes in the CNS
Elevated numbers of CD45+ cells were observed in the brains of WNV-inoculated mice compared to mock-inoculated mice (Figure 1C). WNV-inoculated mice had 20- to 30-fold more CD45+ cells in the CNS than mock-inoculated mice at 1, 2, and 4 wpi (P = 0.002). Similar levels of CD45+ cells were observed in the spinal cords of WNV-inoculated mice (data not shown). After 4 wpi, the number of CD45+ cells in the brains decreased with 2- to 7-fold more CD45+ cells in the brains of WNV-inoculated mice than in mock-inoculated mice, but these differences were not statistically different. In addition, there was more variability from mouse-to-mouse at the later time points, which was consistent with our previous results of variable WNV RNA persistence and histologic lesions after 4 wpi .
WNV-inoculated mice had significantly higher numbers of both CD8+ and CD4+ T cells in their brains than mock-inoculated mice from 1 through 12 wpi (P = 0.002-0.004; Figure 2D and 2E). Both CD8+ and CD4+ T cells remained constant in the brain through week 4 with geometric means of approximately 104 cells per brain for WNV-inoculated mice compared to approximately 102 cells per brain in mock-inoculated mice. After 4 wpi, numbers of T cells in the brain declined to approximately 103 cells per brain for WNV-inoculated mice. Similar results were found in the spinal cord except that infiltration was delayed by one week for CD4+ T cells (peaking at 2 wpi) compared to infiltration in the brain (data not shown).
Activated T cells and Tregs in the CNS
WNV-specific immune cells in the CNS
In our phenotypic analysis, we observed CD138+ plasma cells, and activated CD8+ and CD4+ T cells in the CNS of WNV-inoculated animals for at least 12 wpi. However, despite an active immune response in the CNS, our previous results showed that WNV RNA continues to persist in the CNS of approximately half of the mice at 3 months post-inoculation and a quarter of the mice at 4 months post-inoculation .
Discussion and Conclusions
Our studies are the first to demonstrate the retention of WNV-specific immune cells in the CNS in an immunocompetent mouse model. Immune cells were recruited and maintained in the CNS for at least 12 wpi, including plasma cells, activated T cells and Tregs. Additionally, WNV-specific ASC and CD8+ T cells specific for a dominant epitope of WNV were detected in the brains of mice for up to16 wpi, including mice without clinical disease. The presence of specific immune cells is consistent with our previous studies, which showed that WNV persists in the CNS in a subset of animals as infectious virus for 4 months post-inoculation and viral RNA for 6 months post-inoculation . Overall these results suggest that the presence of virus-specific immune cells in the CNS is not sufficient for viral clearance.
Our current study was limited in that we were unable to correlate WNV persistence and cellular phenotype in the CNS within the same individual mouse because we harvested the entire brain and spinal cord for cell analysis. On the other hand, we have used identical methods, including mouse strain, sex and age, viral dose, inoculation route, and WNV strain, as our previous study , which has been repeated with very similar results in a number of independent studies. Thus, although we do not have correlative data, we have strong evidence that WNV persists as infectious virus in all mice at 1 month post-inoculation and as RNA in approximately 25% of mice at 4 months post-inoculation.
We observed no obvious deficiencies in the immune cell infiltrate in the CNS to account for the observed viral persistence in B6 mice . Previous studies have shown that T cells play a crucial role in clearing WNV from CNS tissues. Mice that lack CD8+ T cells have higher viral burdens, and infectious virus can be recovered for several weeks following initial infection [20, 21]. Additionally, CD4+ T cells are important for sustaining and maintaining primary CD8+ T cells responses in the brain . B cells and antibody play a critical role during WNV infection. μMT mice, which are deficient in B cells, have higher viremia and viral loads in the CNS, suggesting that B cells directly limit the early replication of virus in the CNS ; however, CD8+ T cells are responsible for viral clearance in the CNS tissues . In our studies, elevated numbers of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, and plasma cells were present in the CNS during the time course of the studies.
In addition, we demonstrated that T cells in the brains of mice had early (CD69) and late (CD25) activation markers through 16 wpi. Typically, CD69 is transiently upregulated during early T cell activation; however, in our studies, CD69 was chronically expressed on both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the brain, which suggests either an ongoing stimulation of resident T cells or fresh recruits infiltrating into the CNS. The continual expression of CD69 on T cells occurs in other viral models, including dengue, neurotropic influenza and mouse hepatitis viruses, and is a common feature of CD8+ T cells retained in the CNS [24–26]. It has been postulated that the chronic expression of CD69 identifies cells that are in a state of anergy or non-responsiveness due to prolonged antigen exposure [24, 25, 27, 28]. In our studies, both CD69 and CD25 expressing T cells were recruited and maintained at high percentages in the CNS, suggesting that there is ongoing stimulation of these cells via virus and/or antigen. Alternatively, there may be bystander activation of non-specific cells and/or a failure to turn off the activation state.
We observed long term persistence of WNV-specific CD8+ T cells in brains of mice, which supports the model of ongoing stimulation. At the end of the studies (16 wpi), half of the mice had detectable CD8+ T cells specific for an immunodominant epitope in WNV in the brain. These findings are consistent with our previous finding that WNV RNA and infectious virus persists in the CNS at 16 wpi in 25% and 12% of mice, respectively . Furthermore, WNV-specific ASC were first detected in brains at 2 wpi and persisted for up to 16 wpi.
The trafficking and persistence of ASC in the CNS also occurs in other viral models. We observed that antiviral IgM and IgG ASC in the spleen preceded the detection of ASC in the brain, suggesting that B cells from the periphery are activated and subsequently traffic to the CNS where they differentiate into ASC, as occurs for mouse hepatitis virus . Similar to our results, virus-specific ASC are detected in mouse brains for one year after infection with Sindbis virus  and for 90 days after infection with mouse hepatitis virus [29, 31]. Since we detected WNV RNA for up to six months in the CNS , the retention of WNV-specific ASC within the CNS suggests that these cells contribute to continual viral suppression via long term production of intrathecal antibody as observed with other encephalitic viruses [30–32].
The persistence of WNV in the CNS in the face of a specific local immune response raises the following question: why is viral clearance from the CNS delayed for 6 months in a subset of animals? We propose that the persistent WNV infection in the CNS is a low level, smoldering infection that is prevented from spreading by the presence of WNV-specific intrathecal antibody. Although T cells are activated, and virus-specific CD8+ T cells are present, we speculate that they are inhibited in order to prevent excessive damage to neurons. This inhibition may be due to Tregs, which we observed in the CNS during the entire course of our studies. Lower levels of Tregs are associated with greater disease in humans and mice , and thus, Tregs may be important in inhibiting immunopathology in the CNS and allowing viral persistence. Future studies will focus on testing this model and furthering our understanding of the CNS immune response during persistent viral infections.
Virus and cells
WNV was produced from a full-length cDNA clone of a strain isolated in 2000 in New York as previously described . Viral titers of stocks were determined by plaque assay on Vero cells (ATCC #CCL-81) as previously described . Serum-free WNV stocks were harvested from Vero cells incubated in VP medium (Gibco® Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA).
Five-week-old female B6 mice (Taconic, Germantown, NY) were acclimatized for at least one week in the BSL-3 facility. At six- to seven-weeks of age, mice were inoculated subcutaneously (SC) in the left rear footpad with diluent (mock) or 103 plaque forming units (PFU) of WNV as previously described . After inoculation, all mice were observed for clinical disease daily for the entire study, and they were weighed daily for at least 2 wpi and one to three times per week for the remainder of the study. Clinical signs included ruffled fur, hunching, ataxia, and weakness. A mouse was considered to have clinical West Nile disease if at least one of the following criteria was met: 1) ≥10% weight loss; 2) clinical signs for at least two days. Mice that exhibited severe disease were euthanized. No clinical signs or weight loss were observed in mock-inoculated mice. All WNV-inoculated mice were seropositive for WNV at the time of sacrifice. At various times post-inoculation, mice were sacrificed and transcardially perfused with 60 ml phosphate buffered saline (PBS) plus 1% fetal bovine serum (FBS) [perfusion buffer], and tissues were harvested. All studies were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and followed criteria established by the National Institutes of Health.
Isolation of mononuclear cells
Brains, spinal cords, and spleens were homogenized between glass slides with 10 ml of RPMI 1640 (RPMI, Gibco® Invitrogen) plus 5% FBS. Spinal cords from four WNV-inoculated mice were pooled in order to obtain enough cells for analysis. Homogenates were pressed through a 100 micron cell strainer and centrifuged at 1200 × g for 5 minutes at 4°C. The cell pellet was resuspended in RPMI plus 5% FBS, placed over a 30/70% Percoll (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) step gradient, and centrifuged at 400 × g for 25 minutes at 4°C. The mononuclear cells were collected at the interface, washed two times, and resuspended in RPMI plus 5% FBS.
For cell surface analysis, mononuclear cells (106 cells/test) were incubated with Fc block (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and stained for surface antigen with two or more fluorochrome-labeled monoclonal antibodies directed against CD4, CD8, CD19, CD138, (BD Biosciences), CD25, CD45, Foxp3 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA), and CD69 (Caltag, Burlingame, CA). Cells that were stained for CD4 and CD25 were permeabilized and intracellularly stained using a Foxp3 staining buffer kit (eBioscience) according to manufacturer's protocol. Cells were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde at 4°C overnight prior to analysis with FACSAria flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). For CNS samples, one million live events were counted. For splenocytes, 75,000 live events were counted. For analysis, all samples were first gated on CD45 as described previously for mouse brain samples . Isotype matched irrelevant antibodies were used as controls. Data were analyzed using FlowJo software (v.7, Tree Star, Ashland, OR).
ELISPOT assay for ASC
For WNV-specific ELISPOT assays for ASC, plates (96-well nitrocellulose; Millipore, Billerica, MA) were coated with serum-free WNV (106 PFU/well) or conditioned medium (irrelevant antigen) and then blocked with RPMI plus 10% FBS. Mononuclear cells were isolated from brains and spleens of mock- or WNV-inoculated mice as described above, added to wells (6.25 × 103 to 4 × 105 cells/well) in triplicate, and incubated overnight. ASC spots were developed by sequential addition of biotinylated anti-IgM or anti-IgG (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA), horseradish peroxidase-conjugated strepavidin (Vector Laboratories), and 3-amino-9-ethyl carbazole substrate (BD Biosciences) and counted using a dissecting microscope. The numbers of specific ASC were determined by subtraction of the average number of spots in the irrelevant antigen wells (range: 0-2 in brains, 0-14 in spleens) from the average number of spots in the WNV antigen wells.
Microsphere immunoassay (MIA) for WNV-specific antibody in tissues
Sera, brains and spinal cords were harvested from mock- or WNV-inoculated mice that were sacrificed and perfused at various times post-inoculation as described above. Tissues were processed as previously described . Briefly, tissues were harvested and weighed, and RPMI was added to make a 20% homogenate. Sera and tissue supernatants were heat-inactivated for 1 hour at 56°C and tested at 1:100 and 1:10 dilutions, respectively, using fluorescent MIA for WNV envelope (E) and non-structural 5 (NS5) proteins as previously described [15, 35]. Cutoff values for positive samples were calculated as the average mean fluorescence intensity of sera or tissue supernatants from mock-inoculated mice plus three standard deviations (Microsoft®Office Excel, Microsoft Corporation, Seattle, WA).
CD8+ T cell MHC class I dimer staining
Recombinant soluble dimeric mouse H-2Db:Ig (BD Biosciences) was incubated with one of the following peptides at 640 molar excess: the immunodominant WNV epitope (SSVWNATTA) [18, 19] or an irrelevant H-2Db restricted influenza virus epitope (NP-366-374, Anaspec, San Jose, CA). Anti-mouse IgG1 (BD Biosciences) and isotype control were added and incubated sequentially. Mononuclear cells from brains and spleens of mock- or WNV-inoculated mice were isolated as described above and added to the peptide-dimer mixture (106 cells/test). Cells were then surface stained with anti-CD8 and anti-CD45 and analyzed by flow cytometry as described above. Each tissue sample was tested with WNV peptide and the influenza virus peptide, and the WNV-specific CD8+ cells were determined by subtraction of background staining (influenza virus peptide) from the specific staining (WNV peptide).
Numbers of cells per organ were analyzed for data with 2 independent studies. A one-tailed Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare data from mock- and WNV-inoculated mice, and a two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare data from two different time points for WNV-inoculated mice (GraphPad, San Diego, CA). A two-tailed Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare more than two groups (GraphPad). For all analyses, a P-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.
We would like to thank Kim Appler and Chrystal Chadwick for technical assistance and Dr. Pei-Yong Shi for clone-derived WNV. We acknowledge the Wadsworth Center tissue culture core for cell preparation and the immunology core for assistance with flow cytometry. BSS was supported in part by the Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Disease training grant number 5T32AI05542903 from National Institutes of Health. This work was supported in part by funds from the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, under contract N01-AI25490. The biosafety level-3 (BSL-3) vivarium at the Wadsworth Center was used, funded in part as a core facility by National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, grant number U54-AI057158 (Northeast Biodefense Center).
- Petersen LR, Roehrig JT, Hughes JM: West Nile virus encephalitis. N Engl J Med. 2002, 347: 1225-1226. 10.1056/NEJMo020128.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bode AV, Sejvar JJ, Pape WJ, Campbell GL, Marfin AA: West Nile virus disease: a descriptive study of 228 patients hospitalized in a 4-county region of Colorado in 2003. Clin Infect Dis. 2006, 42: 1234-1240. 10.1086/503038.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sejvar JJ, Haddad MB, Tierney BC, Campbell GL, Marfin AA, Van Gerpen JA, Fleischauer A, Leis AA, Stokic DS, Petersen LR: Neurologic manifestations and outcome of West Nile virus infection. JAMA. 2003, 290: 511-515. 10.1001/jama.290.4.511.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Weiss D, Carr D, Kellachan J, Tan C, Phillips M, Bresnitz E, Layton M: Clinical findings of West Nile virus infection in hospitalized patients, New York and New Jersey, 2000. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001, 7: 654-658. 10.3201/eid0704.010409.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Carson PJ, Konewko P, Wold KS, Mariani P, Goli S, Bergloff P, Crosby RD: Long-term clinical and neuropsychological outcomes of West Nile virus infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2006, 43: 723-730. 10.1086/506939.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Haaland KY, Sadek J, Pergam S, Echevarria LA, Davis LE, Goade D, Harnar J, Nofchissey RA, Sewel CM, Ettestad P: Mental status after West Nile virus infection. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006, 12: 1260-1262.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Klee AL, Maidin B, Edwin B, Poshni I, Mostashari F, Fine A, Layton M, Nash D: Long-term prognosis for clinical West Nile virus infection. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004, 10: 1405-1411.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sadek JR, Pergam SA, Harrington JA, Echevarria LA, Davis LE, Goade D, Harnar J, Nofchissey RA, Sewell CM, Ettestad P, Haaland KY: Persistent neuropsychological impairment associated with West Nile virus infection. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2010, 32: 81-87. 10.1080/13803390902881918.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Murray K, Walker C, Herrington E, Lewis JA, McCormick J, Beasley DW, Tesh RB, Fisher-Hoch S: Persistent infection with West Nile virus years after initial infection. J Infect Dis. 2010, 201: 2-4. 10.1086/648731.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Busch MP, Kleinman SH, Tobler LH, Kamel HT, Norris PJ, Walsh I, Matud JL, Prince HE, Lanciotti RS, Wright DJ, Linnen JM, Caglioti S: Virus and antibody dynamics in acute West Nile virus infection. J Infect Dis. 2008, 198: 984-993. 10.1086/591467.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Prince HE, Tobler LH, Lape-Nixon M, Foster GA, Stramer SL, Busch MP: Development and persistence of West Nile virus-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM), IgA, and IgG in viremic blood donors. J Clin Microbiol. 2005, 43: 4316-4320. 10.1128/JCM.43.9.4316-4320.2005.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Prince HE, Tobler LH, Yeh C, Gefter N, Custer B, Busch MP: Persistence of West Nile virus-specific antibodies in viremic blood donors. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2007, 14: 1228-1230. 10.1128/CVI.00233-07.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Roehrig JT, Nash D, Maldin B, Labowitz A, Martin DA, Lanciotti RS, Campbell GL: Persistence of virus-reactive serum immunoglobulin M antibody in confirmed West Nile virus encephalitis cases. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003, 9: 376-379.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kapoor H, Signs K, Somsel P, Downes FP, Clark PA, Massey JP: Persistence of West Nile Virus (WNV) IgM antibodies in cerebrospinal fluid from patients with CNS disease. J Clin Virol. 2004, 31: 289-291. 10.1016/j.jcv.2004.05.017.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Appler KK, Brown AN, Stewart BS, Behr MJ, Demarest VL, Wong SJ, Bernard KA: Persistence of West Nile virus in the central nervous system and periphery of mice. PLoS One. 2010, 5: e10649-10.1371/journal.pone.0010649.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brown AN, Kent KA, Bennett CJ, Bernard KA: Tissue tropism and neuroinvasion of West Nile virus do not differ for two mouse strains with different survival rates. Virology. 2007, 368: 422-430. 10.1016/j.virol.2007.06.033.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Hori S, Nomura T, Sakaguchi S: Control of regulatory T cell development by the transcription factor Foxp3. Science. 2003, 299: 1057-1061. 10.1126/science.1079490.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Brien JD, Uhrlaub JL, Nikolich-Zugich J: Protective capacity and epitope specificity of CD8(+) T cells responding to lethal West Nile virus infection. Eur J Immunol. 2007, 37: 1855-1863. 10.1002/eji.200737196.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Purtha WE, Myers N, Mitaksov V, Sitati E, Connolly J, Fremont DH, Hansen TH, Diamond MS: Antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes protect against lethal West Nile virus encephalitis. Eur J Immunol. 2007, 37: 1845-1854. 10.1002/eji.200737192.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Shrestha B, Diamond MS: Role of CD8+ T cells in control of West Nile virus infection. J Virol. 2004, 78: 8312-8321. 10.1128/JVI.78.15.8312-8321.2004.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wang Y, Lobigs M, Lee E, Mullbacher A: CD8+ T cells mediate recovery and immunopathology in West Nile virus encephalitis. J Virol. 2003, 77: 13323-13334. 10.1128/JVI.77.24.13323-13334.2003.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sitati EM, Diamond MS: CD4+ T-cell responses are required for clearance of West Nile virus from the central nervous system. J Virol. 2006, 80: 12060-12069. 10.1128/JVI.01650-06.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Diamond MS, Shrestha B, Marri A, Mahan D, Engle M: B cells and antibody play critical roles in the immediate defense of disseminated infection by West Nile encephalitis virus. J Virol. 2003, 77: 2578-2586. 10.1128/JVI.77.4.2578-2586.2003.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Bergmann CC, Altman JD, Hinton D, Stohlman SA: Inverted immunodominance and impaired cytolytic function of CD8+ T cells during viral persistence in the central nervous system. J Immunol. 1999, 163: 3379-3387.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hawke S, Stevenson PG, Freeman S, Bangham CR: Long-term persistence of activated cytotoxic T lymphocytes after viral infection of the central nervous system. J Exp Med. 1998, 187: 1575-1582. 10.1084/jem.187.10.1575.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- van der Most RG, Murali-Krishna K, Ahmed R: Prolonged presence of effector-memory CD8 T cells in the central nervous system after dengue virus encephalitis. Int Immunol. 2003, 15: 119-125. 10.1093/intimm/dxg009.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ziegler SF, Ramsdell F, Alderson MR: The activation antigen CD69. Stem Cells. 1994, 12: 456-465. 10.1002/stem.5530120502.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sancho D, Gomez M, Sanchez-Madrid F: CD69 is an immunoregulatory molecule induced following activation. Trends Immunol. 2005, 26: 136-140. 10.1016/j.it.2004.12.006.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tschen SI, Stohlman SA, Ramakrishna C, Hinton DR, Atkinson RD, Bergmann CC: CNS viral infection diverts homing of antibody-secreting cells from lymphoid organs to the CNS. Eur J Immunol. 2006, 36: 603-612. 10.1002/eji.200535123.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Tyor WR, Wesselingh S, Levine B, Griffin DE: Long term intraparenchymal Ig secretion after acute viral encephalitis in mice. J Immunol. 1992, 149: 4016-4020.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tschen SI, Bergmann CC, Ramakrishna C, Morales S, Atkinson R, Stohlman SA: Recruitment kinetics and composition of antibody-secreting cells within the central nervous system following viral encephalomyelitis. J Immunol. 2002, 168: 2922-2929.PubMedView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Lin MT, Hinton DR, Marten NW, Bergmann CC, Stohlman SA: Antibody prevents virus reactivation within the central nervous system. J Immunol. 1999, 162: 7358-7368.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lanteri MC, O'Brien KM, Purtha WE, Cameron MJ, Lund JM, Owen RE, Heitman JW, Custer B, Hirschkorn DF, Tobler LH, Kiely N, Prince HE, Ndhlovu LC, Nixon DF, Kamel HT, Kelvin DJ, Busch MP, Rudensky AY, Diamond MS, Norris PJ: Tregs control the development of symptomatic West Nile virus infection in humans and mice. J Clin Invest. 2009, 119: 3266-3277.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Shi PY, Tilgner M, Lo MK, Kent KA, Bernard KA: Infectious cDNA clone of the epidemic West Nile virus from New York City. J Virol. 2002, 76: 5847-5856. 10.1128/JVI.76.12.5847-5856.2002.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wong SJ, Demarest VL, Boyle RH, Wang T, Ledizet M, Kar K, Kramer LD, Fikrig E, Koski RA: Detection of human anti-flavivirus antibodies with a West Nile virus recombinant antigen microsphere immunoassay. J Clin Microbiol. 2004, 42: 65-72. 10.1128/JCM.42.1.65-72.2004.PubMedPubMed CentralView ArticleGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.